M T Caribbean

• Judgement of M T Caribbean as per London Small Claim Procedure, making fun of English Law.
  
  
• Charter party and Exhibits submitted by Claimant Regency Legal.
  
  
• Mr John Schofield - Full time LMAA arbitrator interpretation of Rider clause 2, contradicts the ruling on the same by LMAA supporting Member Lambros Hilas who gave the award in M T Caribbean under LMAA small claim Procedure.
  
  
• Mr. Wolfgang Busch - Another arbitrator, had the same opinion on interpretation of Rider Clause 2 as Mr John Schofield. The opinion of Mr Schofield and Mr Wolfgang Busch was in line with Laytime Doctors who represented the charterers but LMAA arbitrator Mr Lambros Hilas deliberately misinterpreted Rider clause 2 in owners Favour.
  
  
• Mr. John Schofield along with LMAA President Later on Tried to defend unfair / Malicious Judgement of Supporting LMAA member Mr Lambros Hilas in M T Caribbean case by admitting that the judgement may not have been as per English Law, but nevertheless could not be challenged, as award under small claim procedure could not be appealed as per LMAA small claim procedure Rules. The law governing the charter party was English Law and the dispute resolution had to be done as per English Law. It is very strange why an Unenglish / Unfair / Malicious award could not be set aside by LMAA..
  
  
• Evidence on Managed Award of M T Caribbean